From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Maxwell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Aug 29, 2024
CR-18-01695-TUC-JAS (EJM) (D. Ariz. Aug. 29, 2024)

Opinion

CR-18-01695-TUC-JAS (EJM)

08-29-2024

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jermaine Lamar Maxwell - 009 Bhishm Deo Neal - 019, Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable James X Soto United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Markovich (Doc. 3347) that recommends denying the Motion to Sever filed by Bhishm Neal (Doc. 3343) and joined in by Jermaine Maxwell (Doc. 3344). A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. The Court will therefore not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Markovich's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3347) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Neal's Motion to Sever (Doc. 3343) is denied.

(3) This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Markovich.


Summaries of

United States v. Maxwell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Aug 29, 2024
CR-18-01695-TUC-JAS (EJM) (D. Ariz. Aug. 29, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jermaine Lamar Maxwell - 009…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Aug 29, 2024

Citations

CR-18-01695-TUC-JAS (EJM) (D. Ariz. Aug. 29, 2024)