From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mata-Chavez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CR-S-11-348 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S-11-348 LKK

09-27-2011

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUVENAL MATA-CHAVEZ, MARCELO RANGEL-MONGEL, AGUSTIN MERCADO-VALDOVINOS, MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ and GUILLERMO PINEDA-SOLORIO, Defendants.

MICHAEL D. LONG (CA State Bar #149475) Attorney for JUVENAL MATA-CHAVEZ Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL D. LONG Attorney for Mr. Mata-Chavez CLEMENTE JIMENEZ Attorney for Mr. Rangel-Mongel OLAF HEDBERG Attorney for Mr. Mercado-Valdovinos KELLY BABINEAU Attorney for Mr. Angel-Ruiz ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Mr. Pineda-Solario BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney HEIKO COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney


MICHAEL D. LONG (CA State Bar #149475)

Attorney for JUVENAL MATA-CHAVEZ

STIPULATION AND

ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS

CONFERENCE

Judge: Hon.

It is hereby stipulated between the parties, Assistant United States Attorney Heiko Coppola, Michael Long, attorney for JUVENAL MATA-CHAVEZ, Clemente Jimenez, attorney for MARCELO RANGEL-MONGEL, Olaf Hedberg, attorney for AGUSTIN MERCADO-VALDOVINOS , Kelly Babineau, attorney for MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ , and Erin Radekin, attorney for GUILLERMO PINEDA-SOLORIO, that the status conference date of September 27, 2011, should be continued until October 25, 2011.

Defense counsel just received a large amount of discovery. Each defense attorney needs time to review the discovery and then meet with his or her client concerning the materials. Each attorney then must negotiate with the prosecutor on behalf of his or her client.

IT IS STIPULATED that the period of time from the signing of this Order up to and including the new status conference date of October 25, 2011, be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation of counsel. Each party stipulates that each defendant's need for additional time to review the discovery outweighs each defendant's, and the public's need for a speedy trial. Each party further stipulates that the ends of justice served by granting such continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and of all the defendants in a speedy trial and that each party would like time to be excluded as provided by Local Code T4 from today's date through October 25, 2011.

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL D. LONG

Attorney for Mr. Mata-Chavez

CLEMENTE JIMENEZ

Attorney for Mr. Rangel-Mongel

OLAF HEDBERG

Attorney for Mr. Mercado-Valdovinos

KELLY BABINEAU Attorney for Mr. Angel-Ruiz

ERIN RADEKIN

Attorney for Mr. Pineda-Solario

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

HEIKO COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

MICHAEL D. LONG (CA State Bar #149475)

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

JUVENAL MATA-CHAVEZ, MARCELO RANGEL-MONGEL,

AGUSTIN MERCADO-VALDOVINOS,

MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ and GUILLERMO PINEDA-SOLORIO, Defendants.

No. CR-S-11-348 LKK

ORDER

Date: 10-25-11

Time: 9:15 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for September 27, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. be continued to October 25, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. Based on the representations of counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the granting a continuance in this case will permit each attorney to effectively represent his or her client by giving each attorney adequate time to review the recently provided discovery and then to consult with his or her client. The ends of justice served by granting such continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and of all the defendants in a speedy trial.

The period of time from September 23, 2011, up to and including the new status conference date of October 25, 2011, is excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation of counsel.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Mata-Chavez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CR-S-11-348 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Mata-Chavez

Case Details

Full title:THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUVENAL MATA-CHAVEZ, MARCELO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S-11-348 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)