From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Masters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 8, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cr-00145-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cr-00145-MMD-GWF

04-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN MASTERS, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Ryan Masters' Motion for Exemption from Local Rule 10-6(a). (Dkt. no. 157.) The identical motion is docketed as a "Motion for Appointment of Co-Counsel. (Dkt. no. 158). Defendant has been appointed counsel. While Defendant contends his counsel has not been able to "complete motions or other related matters . . . in an effort to maintain timeliness of progress" in this case, the Court finds that such a reason, even if true, does not warrant exemption from Local Rule 10-6(a). The Court further notes that counsel may not have "complete[d] motions" if there is no valid motion to file.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED the Defendant's identical Motions for Exemption from Local Rule IA 10-6(a) docketed as nos. 157 and 158 are DENIED.

______________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Masters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 8, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cr-00145-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Masters

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN MASTERS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cr-00145-MMD-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2013)