From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mascolo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK

10-26-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT MASCOLO, Defendant.


ORDER

The defendant was convicted in case number Cr. S-96-397. He has, in the past, filed a "motion to vacate" and a "motion to dismiss restitution". Both motions were denied. He has now filed a "motion to set aside the judgment". That motion is DENIED.

As to any further motions, the court will not specifically address them. If there is no response in thirty (30) days, the defendant may take that as a denial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Mascolo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Mascolo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT MASCOLO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)