From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Marutyan

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 5, 2024
20 Cr. 652 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2024)

Opinion

20 Cr. 652 (VM)

01-05-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALBERT MARUTYAN, a/k/a “Abo,” Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York EMILY DEININGER Assistant United States Attorney ALBERT MARUTYAN, BORIS NEKTALOV, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant


DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York

EMILY DEININGER Assistant United States Attorney

ALBERT MARUTYAN, BORIS NEKTALOV, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant

CONSENT PRELIMINSARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE VICTOR MARRERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about December 3, 2020, ALBERT MARUTYAN a/k/a “Abo,” (the “Defendant”) among others, was charged in a six-count Indictment, 20 Cr. 652 (VM) (the “Indictment”), with racketeering conspiracy, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(d) (Count One); conspiracy to commit fraud relating to means of identification, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028(f) (Count Two); conspiracy to commit access device fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1029(b)(2) (Count Three); conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count Four); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A(a)(1) and 2 (Counts Five and Six);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963, of any interest acquired or maintained in violation of Section 1962; any interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over, any enterprise established, operated, controlled, conducted, or participated in the conduct of in violation of Section 1962; and any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the racketeering activity charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, on or about May 30,2023, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Indictment and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1963, a sum of money equal to $2,973,780.57 in United States currency, representing property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the racketeering activity charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $2,973,780.57 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; and WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Emily Deininger, of counsel, and the Defendant and his counsel, Boris Nektalov, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offenses charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $2,973,780.57 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant ALBERT MARUTYAN, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, banker certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessaiy, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

AGREED AND CONSENTED TO.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Marutyan

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 5, 2024
20 Cr. 652 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Marutyan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALBERT MARUTYAN, a/k/a “Abo,” Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 5, 2024

Citations

20 Cr. 652 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2024)