From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez-Parra

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 5, 2012
465 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-10109 D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00629-CW

01-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAYRA MARTINEZ-PARRA, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Claudia A. Wilken, District Judge, Presiding

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Mayra Martinez-Parra appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Martinez-Parra contends that her fully consecutive sentence is substantively unreasonable. The consecutive sentence is consistent with the Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(a). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez-Parra

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 5, 2012
465 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez-Parra

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAYRA MARTINEZ-PARRA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

465 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012)