From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez-Arias

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CRS 11-118 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CRS 11-118 MCE

09-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN MARTINEZ-ARIAS Et al, Defendants.

DINA L. SANTOS Attorney for Defendant JUAN MARTINEZ-ARIAS GILBERT ROQUE Attorney for Defendant DANIEL SALINAS DOUGLAS BEEVERS Attorney for Defendant ANTONIO SANCHEZ-GAONA CARL LARSON Attorney for Defendant EDGARDO SOLORIO-CAMACHO MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DINA L. SANTOS, Bar #204200

A Professional Law Corporation

Attorney for Defendant

JUAN OSCAR MARTINEZ-ARIAS

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING

DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: Nov 3, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney MICHAEL ANDERSON, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Dina L. Santos, Counsel for Defendant JUAN MARTINEZ-ARIAS; Attorney Gilbert Roque, Counsel for Defendant DANIEL SALINAS; Attorney Douglas Beevers, Counsel for Defendant ANTONIO SANCHEZ-GAONA; Attorney Carl Larson, Counsel for Defendant EDGARDO SOLORIO CAMACHO, that the status conference scheduled for September 29, 2011, be vacated and the matter be continued to this Court's criminal calendar on November 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., for further status.

This continuance is requested by the defense in order to continue further client consultation concerning available courses of action, and to continue in negotiations to reach an acceptable plea agreement

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et. seq. be tolled pursuant to § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local code T-4 (time to prepare), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court is advised that all counsel have conferred about this request, that they have agreed to the November 3, 2011 date, and that all counsel have authorized Ms. Santos to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DINA L. SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

JUAN MARTINEZ-ARIAS

GILBERT ROQUE

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL SALINAS

DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Attorney for Defendant

ANTONIO SANCHEZ-GAONA

CARL LARSON

Attorney for Defendant

EDGARDO SOLORIO-CAMACHO

MICHAEL ANDERSON

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez-Arias

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CRS 11-118 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez-Arias

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN MARTINEZ-ARIAS Et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. CRS 11-118 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)