From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Central District of Illinois
Feb 3, 2017
Case No. 17-30004 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 17-30004

02-03-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN H. MARTINEZ


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The United States of America and the Defendant having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P. and CDIL Rule 72.1(A)(24). The Defendant waived Indictment and entered a plea of guilty to the Information. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent factual basis containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, that a pre-sentence investigation and report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly. February 3, 2017
Date

s\ Tom Schanzle-Haskins

TOM SCHANZLE-HASKINS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service, being the Court's electronic service, shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Central District of Illinois
Feb 3, 2017
Case No. 17-30004 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN H. MARTINEZ

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Central District of Illinois

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

Citations

Case No. 17-30004 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2017)