From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Sep 7, 2016
Case No. 16-10062-JTM (D. Kan. Sep. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-10062-JTM

09-07-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OMAR CANTERO MARTINEZ, and ARMANDO SOTELO, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant Omar Cantero Martinez has moved in limine to exclude any reference to his immigration status. (Dkt. 25). The government's response states that it will not introduce evidence of that status, unless Martinez "invites such evidence—for example, by suggesting ... he is a lawful resident of the United States." (Dkt. 30, at 1). The government further adds the caveat that evidence of Martinez's Mexican nationality, as opposed to his immigration status, is relevant and admissible as explaining his motive for the alleged bias attack on the Somalis involved in the incident. The defendant has filed no reply objecting to such evidence.

IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2016, that the defendant's Motion in Limine (Dkt. 25) is granted as provided herein.

s/ J. Thomas Marten

J. THOMAS MARTEN, Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Sep 7, 2016
Case No. 16-10062-JTM (D. Kan. Sep. 7, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OMAR CANTERO MARTINEZ, and ARMANDO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Sep 7, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-10062-JTM (D. Kan. Sep. 7, 2016)