From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 9, 2013
NO. CR 13-0208 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CR 13-0208 WHA

05-09-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL GARCIA MARTINEZ, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney LAURA VARTAIN HORN Assistant United States Attorney BRANDON LEBLANC Assistant Federal Public Defender Attorney for Daniel Garcia Martinez


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
LAURA VARTAIN HORN (CABN 258485)
Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6831

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Email: Laura.VartainHorn@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXCLUDING TIME FROM MAY 7, 2013 TO MAY 21, 2013

On May 7, 2013, the parties in this case appeared before the Court. At that time, the Court set the matter to May 21, 2013. For the reasons stated during the hearing, the parties have agreed to exclude the period of time between May 7, 2013 and May 21, 2013 for any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties represented that granting the exclusion of time would allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). At the hearing, the Court made findings consistent with this agreement. SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

__________

LAURA VARTAIN HORN

Assistant United States Attorney

__________

BRANDON LEBLANC

Assistant Federal Public Defender Attorney for Daniel Garcia Martinez

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons stated above and at the May 7, 2013, hearing, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between May 7, 2013 and May 21, 2013 would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between May 7, 2013 and May 21, 2013, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between May 7, 2013 and May 21, 2013, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

____________________

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 9, 2013
NO. CR 13-0208 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL GARCIA MARTINEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

NO. CR 13-0208 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)