From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2011
2:99-cr-038-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

2:99-cr-038-KJD-RJJ

10-11-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARIEL VARONA MARTINEZ, Defendant.

DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney ELIZABETH A. OLSON Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney Elizabeth A. Olson ELIZABETH A. OLSON Assistant United States Attorney


DANIEL G. BOGDEN

United States Attorney

ELIZABETH A. OLSON

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO

UNSEAL RECORDS OR. IN THE

ALTERNATIVE- TO FILE RESPONSE

TO DEFENDANT'S PETITION

UNDER SEAL

CERTIFICATION: Undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is timely filed.

THE UNITED STATES, by and through DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, and ELIZABETH A. OLSON, Assistant United States Attorney, files this motion for an order unsealing the transcript of Defendant's change-of-plea hearing, the transcript of Defendant's sentencing hearing, the plea agreement, and the judgment in this case or, in the alternative, to file under seal its response in opposition to Defendant's petition for a writ of error coram nobis. This order is sought for the following reasons:

1. The defendant, ARIEL VARONA MARTINEZ, has filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See CR 102. On August 1, 2011, this Court ordered the government to respond to Defendant's petition by September 1, 2011. See CR 104.

2. The government's response refers to and quotes from the transcript of Defendant's change-of-plea hearing, the transcript of Defendant's sentencing hearing, the plea agreement, and the judgment. It appears from the clerk's record that each of these documents was filed under seal. Although the government attached copies of these documents to its (unsealed) response to Defendant's 2001 motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, see CR 93, undersigned counsel has found no order unsealing those documents.

3. From her review of the available documents, undersigned counsel believes the documents in this case were sealed because Defendant was at that time cooperating with law enforcement. Undersigned counsel assumes that the parties asked to file these documents under seal to avoid public disclosure of the fact of Defendant's cooperation. Other than general references to Defendant's cooperation, undersigned counsel sees nothing in the transcript of Defendant's change-of-plea hearing, the transcript of Defendant's sentencing hearing, the plea agreement, or the judgment that would warrant sealing.

4. In his petition, which is unsealed, Defendant publicly acknowledges that he provided substantial assistance to the government both before and after his sentencing. CR 101, at 2-3. In light of Defendant's public acknowledgment of cooperation, undersigned counsel does not believe any purpose would be served by continuing to maintain under seal the transcript of Defendant's change-of-plea hearing, the transcript of Defendant's sentencing hearing, the plea agreement, or the judgment.

5. The government's response in opposition to Defendant's petition cites to and quotes these documents. Therefore if the documents are to remain sealed, the government's response should be filed under seal as well.

WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, the government respectfully requests an order unsealing the transcript of Defendant's change-of-plea hearing, the transcript of Defendant's sentencing hearing, the plea agreement, and the judgment in this case. In the alternative, the government respectfully requests that its opposition to Defendant's petition for a writ of error coram nobis be filed under seal.

DANIEL G. BOGDEN

United States Attorney

Elizabeth A. Olson

ELIZABETH A. OLSON

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS ORDERED THAT THE TRANSCRIPTS ARE UNSEALED AS REQUESTED.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2011
2:99-cr-038-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARIEL VARONA MARTINEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

2:99-cr-038-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2011)