From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martin-Zieber

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 20, 2016
646 F. App'x 342 (5th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-50454

04-20-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KEITH DAVID MARTIN-ZIEBER, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:14-CR-268-1 Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

The attorney appointed to represent Keith David Martin-Zieber has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martin-Zieber has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

United States v. Martin-Zieber

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 20, 2016
646 F. App'x 342 (5th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Martin-Zieber

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KEITH DAVID MARTIN-ZIEBER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 20, 2016

Citations

646 F. App'x 342 (5th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Hanna v. Shoop

Judges of this Court have declined to decide whether Martinez applies to Ohio without guidance from the…