From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martin

United States District Court, District of Montana
Feb 9, 2023
CR 22-27-BU-DLC (D. Mont. Feb. 9, 2023)

Opinion

CR 22-27-BU-DLC

02-09-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JIM DEAN MARTIN, Defendant.


ORDER

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge United States District Court

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto's Findings & Recommendation Concerning Plea. (Doc. 43.) Because neither party objected, they are not entitled to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Therefore, the Court reviews the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

Jim Dean Martin is charged with one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), as set forth in the Superseding Information. (Doc. 34.) Judge DeSoto recommends that this Court accept Mr. Martin's guilty plea as to the Superseding Information after he appeared before her pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Court finds no clear error in Judge DeSoto's Findings and Recommendation and adopts them in full, including the recommendation to defer acceptance of the Plea Agreement until sentencing when the Court will have reviewed the Plea Agreement and Presentence Investigation Report. In light of the United States' motion for preliminary order of forfeiture (Doc. 45), the Court will address the issue of forfeiture by separate order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge DeSoto's Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 43) is ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Martin's motion to change plea (Doc. 36) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jim Dean Martin is adjudged guilty as charged in the Superseding Information.


Summaries of

United States v. Martin

United States District Court, District of Montana
Feb 9, 2023
CR 22-27-BU-DLC (D. Mont. Feb. 9, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JIM DEAN MARTIN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Feb 9, 2023

Citations

CR 22-27-BU-DLC (D. Mont. Feb. 9, 2023)