From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 15, 2003
84 F. App'x 804 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted December 8, 2003.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-93-05028-OWW.

Page 805.

Patrick Hanly, Esq., USSC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Felix Claude Martin, BSS-Behavioral Systems Southwest, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Felix Claude Martin appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because we cannot review the district court's discretionary decision not to modify Martin's sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Lowe, 136 F.3d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1998).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 15, 2003
84 F. App'x 804 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

United States v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix Claude MARTIN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 15, 2003

Citations

84 F. App'x 804 (9th Cir. 2003)