Opinion
CRIMINAL ACTION 22-115
01-08-2024
ORDER
Gene E.K. Pratter United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 8th day of January 2024, upon consideration of Defendant's Counseled Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. 28), Defendant's Pro Se Motion To Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. 40), Defendant's Pro Se Affidavit in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 41), the Government's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (Doc. No. 42), and Defendant's Pro Se Motion to Appoint a Criminal Defense Investigator (Doc. No. 39), for the reasons articulated in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Counseled Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. 28) is DEEMED MOOT;
2. Defendant's Pro Se Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED; and
3. Defendant's Pro Se Motion to Appoint a Criminal Defense Investigator (Doc. No. 39) is DENIED.