From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Marshall

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2013
505 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7605

01-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KALVIN MARSHALL, Defendant - Appellant.

Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:02-cr-00225-HEH-2; 3:12-cv-00480-HEH) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kalvin Marshall seeks to appeal the district court's order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion and dismissing it as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court's assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marshall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Marshall

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2013
505 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KALVIN MARSHALL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

505 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2013)