From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Marshall

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 3, 2022
2:19-CR-00270-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-CR-00270-JAD-BNW

10-03-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MARSHALL, Defendant.

AMANDA S. PELLIZZARI, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant. JIM W. FANG Assistant United States Attorney.


AMANDA S. PELLIZZARI, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant.

JIM W. FANG Assistant United States Attorney.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING (SIXTH REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Defendant, ROBERT MARSHALL, by and through his counsel, AMANDA S. PELLIZZARI, ESQ., and the United States of America, by its counsel, JIM W. FANG, Assistant U.S. Attorney, that the Sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently set for October 20, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. be continued at least 45 days, and not sooner than November 21, 2022.

This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. That attorney Lance Maningo, Esq. will be substituting in as retained counsel on this case.

2. That Mr. Maningo will be in a murder trial at the time currently set for sentencing.

If this stipulation is approved, Mr. Maningo will file a substation of counsel.

2. That Mr. Marshall is currently out of custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to counsel for the United States and he has no objection to the continuance.

4. That the additional time requested is for the purposes stated above and not sought for the purposes of delay, 5. That denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

6. That this is the sixth request to continue the Sentencing hearing in this matter.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. That attorney Lance Maningo, Esq. will be substituting in as retained counsel on this case.

2. That Mr. Maningo will be in a murder trial at the time currently set for sentencing.

If this stipulation is approved, Mr. Maningo will file a substation of counsel.

3. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to counsel for the United States and he has no objection to the continuance.

4. That the additional time requested is for the purposes stated above and not sought for the purposes of delay, 5. That denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

6. That this is the fifth request to continue the Sentencing hearing in this matter.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for October 20, 2022 be vacated and continued to December 12, 2022, at 2:30 p.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Marshall

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 3, 2022
2:19-CR-00270-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MARSHALL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

2:19-CR-00270-JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2022)