From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mares

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 31, 2022
2:20-cr-00018-JCM-EJY-2 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cr-00018-JCM-EJY-2

01-31-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO MARES, Defendant.

CHRISTOPHER CHIOU, ALLISON REESE Attorneys for United States of America. Adam L. Gill, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Francisco Mares


CHRISTOPHER CHIOU, ALLISON REESE Attorneys for United States of America.

Adam L. Gill, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Francisco Mares

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING AND REVOCATION OF PRETRIAL RELEASE

HON. JAMES C. MAHAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Christopher Chiou, Acting United States Attorney, and Allison Reese, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, Adam L. Gill, Esq., counsel for Defendant Francisco Mares, that the Sentencing and Revocation of Pretrial Release hearings currently set for February 2, 2022, at 10:30 a.m., be continued for forty-five (45) days or a date convenient for the Court.

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the government needs additional time to review the sentencing materials submitted by the Defendant and to investigate the claims made therein.

2. The Defendant is not in custody and agrees to this continuance.

3. The parties agree to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. In addition, the continuance sought is not for delay and the ends of justice are in fact served by the granting of such continuance which outweigh any interest of the public and the defendant in proceeding with sentencing and pretrial revocation on February 2, 2022.

ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the stipulation of Counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the government needs additional time to review the sentencing materials submitted by the Defendant and to investigate the claims made therein.

2. The Defendant is not in custody and agrees to this continuance.

3. The parties agree to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. In addition, the continuance sought is not for delay and the ends of justice are in fact served by the granting of such continuance which outweigh any interest of the public and the defendant in proceeding with sentencing and pretrial revocation on February 2, 2022.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Sentencing and Revocation of Pretrial Release hearings, currently scheduled for February 2, 2022, at 10:30 a.m., be vacated and continued to March 23, 2022, at the hour of 10:30 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Mares

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 31, 2022
2:20-cr-00018-JCM-EJY-2 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Mares

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO MARES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 31, 2022

Citations

2:20-cr-00018-JCM-EJY-2 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2022)