From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Marcelino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 25, 2017
Criminal No. 3:12CR77-HEH (E.D. Va. Sep. 25, 2017)

Opinion

Criminal No. 3:12CR77-HEH

09-25-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONESIMO MARCELINO, Petitioner.


ORDER
(Adopting Report and Recommendation and Denying Amended 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion)

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Marcelino's ninth objection is SUSTAINED IN PART, and his remaining objections (ECF No. 216) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 215) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;
3. Marcelino's Amended § 2255 Motion (ECF No. 205) and § 2255 Motion (ECF No. 161) are DENIED;
4. The action is DISMISSED; and,
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Should Marcelino desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: September 25, 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

United States v. Marcelino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Sep 25, 2017
Criminal No. 3:12CR77-HEH (E.D. Va. Sep. 25, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Marcelino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONESIMO MARCELINO, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Sep 25, 2017

Citations

Criminal No. 3:12CR77-HEH (E.D. Va. Sep. 25, 2017)