Opinion
20-cr-20599
07-22-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D2 CORY JUSTIN MANN, Defendant.
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Mag. Judge.
ORDER ON EX PARTE MOTION SEEKING APPROVAL TO SERVE RULE 17 SUBPOENAS
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Defendant Cory Justin Mann (“Defendant”) having filed an Ex Parte Motion Seeking Approval to Serve Rule 17 Subpoenas (the “Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 and Local Rule 17.1(b), and the Court having considered the Motion and its Exhibit, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises thereof:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is Granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may serve the Subpoenas attached as Exhibit 1 to the Motion on the entities identified therein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event a Subpoena needs to be reserved on an entity because there was an error in the address or that entity has directed that the subpoena be served via fax or email, or that the entity has requested more time to comply with the subpoena or clarification as to the subpoena's terms, defense counsel has Court approval to address such non-substantive matters that may arise in the administration of the Subpoenas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.