From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mangels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Jun 21, 2016
CR 16-6-M-DLC (D. Mont. Jun. 21, 2016)

Opinion

CR 16-6-M-DLC

06-21-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAUS WADE MANGELS, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to one count of the possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2) as set forth in the Superseding Information. In exchange for Defendant's plea, the United States has agreed to dismiss the Indictment and the Superseding Indictment filed against him.

After examining the Defendant under oath, I have made the following determinations:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea,

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charge against him and consequences of pleading guilty to the charge,

3. That the Defendant fully understands his constitutional rights, and the extent to which he is waiving those rights by pleading guilty, and

4. That the plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea, supported by an independent basis in fact sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the offense charged.

The Court further concludes that the Defendant had adequate time to review the Plea Agreement with counsel, that he fully understands each and every provision of the agreement and that all of the statements in the Plea Agreement are true. Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in the Superseding Information, and that sentence be imposed. I further recommend that the Indictment and Superseding Indictment be dismissed.

This report is forwarded with the recommendation that the Court defer a decision regarding acceptance until the Court has reviewed the Plea Agreement and the presentence report.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

Jeremiah C. Lynch

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mangels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Jun 21, 2016
CR 16-6-M-DLC (D. Mont. Jun. 21, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Mangels

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAUS WADE MANGELS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 21, 2016

Citations

CR 16-6-M-DLC (D. Mont. Jun. 21, 2016)