From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Malley

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 18, 2022
21 Cr. 215 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2022)

Opinion

21 Cr. 215 (ER)

07-18-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIC MALLEY, Defendant.


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SUBSTITUTE ASSETS

HONORABLE EDGARDO RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about March 31, 2021, ERIC MALLEY (the “Defendant”) was charged in a two-count Information, 21 Cr. 215 (ER) (the “Information”), with securities fraud, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) & 78ff; Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5; and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2 (Count One); and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Count Two);

WHEREAS, on or about May 20, 2021, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), a sum of money equal to $5,625,747.45 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information and money received in connection with the Defendant's applications in or about April 2020 for Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Program Loans;

WHEREAS, on or about July 19, 2021, the Court entered a Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment (the “Order of Forfeiture”), imposing a money judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $5,625,747.45 (the “Money Judgment”) representing the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained (D.E. 31).

WHEREAS, to date, the entire Money Judgment against the Defendant remains unpaid;

WHEREAS, as a result of acts and omissions of the Defendant, the Government, despite its exercise of due diligence, has been unable to locate or obtain the remaining proceeds of the offenses charged in Count One of the Information;

WHEREAS, the Government has identified the following specific asset in which the Defendant has an ownership interest:

a. 119 Proprietors Crossing, New Canaan, Connecticut 06840 recorded as Block 140 Lot 67, in Fairfield County, City of New Canaan, State of Connecticut;
(the “Substitute Asset”); and

WHEREAS, the Government is seeking the forfeiture of all of the Defendant's right, title and interest in the Substitute Asset;

NOW IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. All of the Defendant's right, title and interest in the Substitute Asset is hereby forfeited to the United States of America, for disposition in accordance with the law, subject to the provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n).

2. Upon entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture, the Substitute Asset shall be applied towards the satisfaction of the Money Judgment entered against the Defendant.

3. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the United States shall publish for at least thirty (30) consecutive days on the official government internet forfeiture site, www.forfeiture.gov, notice of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Substitute Assets and provide notice that any person, other than the Defendant in this case, claiming an interest in the Substitute Asset must file a petition within sixty (60) days from the first day of publication of the notice on this official government internet site, or no later than thirty-five (35) days from the mailing of actual notice, whichever is earlier.

4. The notice referenced in the preceding paragraph shall state that the petition shall be for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the Substitute Asset, shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title or interest in the Substitute Asset and any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim and the relief sought, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n).

5. The United States may also, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person, other than the Defendant, known to have an alleged interest in the Substitute Asset, as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified.

6. Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this Court will enter a Final Order of Forfeiture with respect to the Substitute Asset, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n), in which all interests will be addressed.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Substitute Assets, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(e).

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Malley

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 18, 2022
21 Cr. 215 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Malley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIC MALLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 18, 2022

Citations

21 Cr. 215 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2022)