Opinion
S118 Cr. 398 (VEC)
03-11-2022
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT
HONORABLE VALERIE E. CAPRONI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
WHEREAS, on or about June 7, 2019, MUDASSAR MALIK (the “Defendant”), was charged in a three-count Superseding Information, S118 Cr. 385 (VEC) (the “Information”), with conspiracy to commit access device fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1029(a)(2) and (b)(2) (Count One); conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count Two); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A(a)(1), 1028A(b), and 2 (Count Three);
WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(2)(B) and 1029(c)(1)(C), of any and all property constituting or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, and any and all personal property used or intended to be used to commit the offense charged in Count One of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense that the Defendant personally obtained;
WHEREAS, the Information included a second forfeiture allegation as to Count Two of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Information;
WHEREAS, the Information included a third forfeiture allegation as to Count Two of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), of any and all property constituting or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count Two of the Information;
WHEREAS, on or about June 7, 2019, the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One through Three of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegations with respect to Counts One and Two of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(2)(A), 982(a)(2)(B), and 1029(c)(1)(C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of a sum of money in United States currency representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information;
WHEREAS, the Government asserts that $2,000.00 in United States currency represents the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with his co-defendants, Syes Ali Raza and Ali Naqvi (the “Co- defendants”), to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-defendants in this case; and
WHEREAS, the Government seeks a money judgment in the amount of $2,000.00 in United States currency, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(2)(A), 982(a)(2)(B), and 1029(c)(1)(C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), representing proceeds traceable to the Commission of the offense charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained;
WHEREAS, the Court finds that as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $2,000 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the Co-defendants, to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-defendants in this case, shall be entered against the Defendant.
2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant MUDASSAR MALIK, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.
5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.
6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
8. The Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified copies of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment to Assistant United States Attorney Alexander J. Wilson, Co-Chief of the Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, United States Attorney's Office, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.
SO ORDERED: