From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Malik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 28, 2013
Criminal No. 11-130 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Criminal No. 11-130 (SRC)

01-28-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ATIF MALIK, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Reduction of Sentence [docket item # 40]; and

IT APPEARING that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, which governs the correction or reduction of a sentence, applies to the instant motion; and it further

APPEARING that Rule 35(b) provides that the government may move for a reduction of sentence for substantial assistance provided by the defendant in investigating or prosecuting another person; and it further

APPEARING that Rule 35 does not contemplate motions for the reduction of a sentence filed by a defendant; and it further

APPEARING that Defendant has no standing under Rule 35 to obtain the relief sought;

For the foregoing reasons,

IT IS on this 28th day of January 2013,

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion For Reduction of Sentence [docket item # 40] be and hereby is DENIED.

_____________

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

United States v. Malik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 28, 2013
Criminal No. 11-130 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Malik

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ATIF MALIK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

Criminal No. 11-130 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2013)