From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Magee

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 6, 2024
2:24-mj-01056-ADB (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-mj-01056-ADB

06-06-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINCY MAGEE


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

HONORABLE ANDREA D. BERGMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with tile operative COVID“19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[✓] That tire Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding® held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding® held on this date may be conducted by:

[✓] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.
[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Magee

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 6, 2024
2:24-mj-01056-ADB (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Magee

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINCY MAGEE

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 6, 2024

Citations

2:24-mj-01056-ADB (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2024)