From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Madrigal-Cardenas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
1:11-cr-00358 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cr-00358 AWI

01-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VICTOR ALFONSO MADRIGAL-CARDENAS, et al., Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KAREN A. ESCOBAR Assistant U.S. Attorney RACHEL HILL Attorney for Defendant Victor Alfonso Madrigal- Cardenas DAVID TORRES Attorney for Defendant Jerman Madrigal ROGER LITMAN Attorney for Defendant Aurelio Anaya- Sanchez PETER JONES Attorney for Defendant Javier Aranda- Barrajas JOHN GARLAND Attorney for Defendant Ivan Carrillo E. MARSHALL HODGKINS Attorney for Defendant Carlos Mendez-Sosa KATHERINE HART Attorney for Defendant Antonio Morales CARL FALLER Attorney for Defendant Juan Luis Quintero- Pimentel PATIENCE MILROD Attorney for Defendant Juan Luis Quintero- Pimentel


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KAREN A. ESCOBAR

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE AND ORDER

Defendants in the above-captioned matter, by and through their respective attorneys, and the United States of America, by and through its attorneys, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, and KAREN A. ESCOBAR, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby enter into the following stipulation:

1. The parties to the above-captioned matter agree to vacate the January 23, 2012, hearing date and reset the matter for February 13, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.

This is the earliest available date and time for all parties.

2. The parties stipulate that the continuance is necessitated by the parties need to conduct further investigation, continue plea negotiations and effectively communicate the government's offers to defendants, who are housed at Lerdo.

3. The parties stipulate that time is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act and that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, in that the failure to grant the continuance would deny the parties' sufficient opportunity to conduct further investigation and/or resolve the matter.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Karen A. Escobar

KAREN A. ESCOBAR

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Rachel Hill

RACHEL HILL

Attorney for Defendant

Victor Alfonso Madrigal

Cardenas

David Torres

DAVID TORRES

Attorney for Defendant

Jerman Madrigal

Roger Litman

ROGER LITMAN

Attorney for Defendant

Aurelio Anaya

Sanchez

Peter Jones

PETER JONES

Attorney for Defendant

Javier Aranda

Barrajas

John Garland

JOHN GARLAND

Attorney for Defendant

Ivan Carrillo

E. Marshall Hodgkins

E. MARSHALL HODGKINS

Attorney for Defendant

Carlos Mendez-Sosa

Katherine Hart

KATHERINE HART

Attorney for Defendant

Antonio Morales

Carl Faller

CARL FALLER

Attorney for Defendant

Juan Luis Quintero

Pimentel

Patience Milrod

PATIENCE MILROD

Attorney for Defendant

Juan Luis Quintero

Pimentel

ORDER

Having read and considered the foregoing stipulation, IT IS THE ORDER of the Court that the current hearing date of January 23, 2012, is hereby vacated and is reset for February 13, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT time shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act and that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, in that the failure to grant the continuance would deny the parties' sufficient opportunity to conduct further investigation and/or resolve the matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Madrigal-Cardenas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
1:11-cr-00358 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Madrigal-Cardenas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VICTOR ALFONSO MADRIGAL-CARDENAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

1:11-cr-00358 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)