Opinion
2:11-CR-0262-02- WBS
01-20-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL LARRY MACK, Defendant.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant PAUL LARRY MACK BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424
Federal Defender
BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
PAUL LARRY MACK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb
It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, PAUL MACK, by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Monday, January 23, 2012, be vacated and reset for a change of plea hearing on Monday, February 13, 2012 at 9:30 a.m..
The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case. In addition, the parties have reached a tentative resolution of this case and a related state case and need additional time to finalize the plea agreement.
Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the change of plea hearing set for February 13, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL J. BRODERICK
Federal Defender
Benjamin Galloway
BENJAMIN GALLOWAY
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
PAUL LARRY MACK
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
Benjamin Galloway for
JASON HITT
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER
The above stipulation of the parties is accepted. The status conference as to defendant Paul Larry Mack set for January 23, 2012, is VACATED. This case is ordered to be re-calendared on February 13, 2012 at 9:30 a.m., for a change of plea.
The court finds, based on the reasons stated above, that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.
____________________________
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE