From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lupercio-Mendoza

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2016
651 F. App'x 578 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-10169

05-31-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISRAEL LUPERCIO-MENDOZA, a.k.a. Israel Mendoza-Lupercio, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00052-SPL MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Israel Lupercio-Mendoza appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lupercio-Mendoza's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lupercio-Mendoza has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Lupercio-Mendoza waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Lupercio-Mendoza

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2016
651 F. App'x 578 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Lupercio-Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISRAEL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

651 F. App'x 578 (9th Cir. 2016)