From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lumsden

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 20, 1971
449 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 71-1494.

September 20, 1971.

Paul Halvonik, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), Jan E. Peterson, William L. Hanson, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

Ernest Scott, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Stan Pitkin, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before DUNIWAY, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


Congress has the power to conscript, United States v. O'Brien, 1968, 391 U.S. 367, 377, 88 S.Ct. 1673, 20 L.Ed. 2d 672; conscription does not constitute involuntary servitude, Arver v. United States, 1918, 245 U.S. 366, 38 S.Ct. 159, 62 L.Ed. 349; United States v. Gidmark, 9 Cir., 1971, 440 F.2d 773, nor does it violate due process, United States v. Butler, 6 Cir., 1968, 389 F.2d 172.

Affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

United States v. Lumsden

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 20, 1971
449 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

United States v. Lumsden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Samuel LUMSDEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 20, 1971

Citations

449 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ross

Ross' arguments are foreclosed by prior decisions of this court. See United States v. Lumsden, 9 Cir., 1971,…