Summary
rejecting Alleyne challenge to sentence imposed prior to 1998 on multiple grounds, including because "Alleyne applies only to facts which increase minimum punishment required by statute. It does not apply to facts which increase a defendant's guidelines sentencing range"
Summary of this case from United States v. MitchellOpinion
4:95-CR-3054
06-09-2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KEITH LOVELESS, Defendant.
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum and order, the defendant's Motion to Correct and Reduce Sentence (filing 151), which the Court has construed as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the defendant's sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is dismissed.
BY THE COURT:
__________
John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge