From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lough

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 4, 2018
No. 17-4125 (4th Cir. May. 4, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-4125

05-04-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL P. LOUGH, Defendant - Appellant.

Katy J. Cimino, Clarksburg, West Virginia, Kristen M. Leddy, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Sarah W. Montoro, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cr-00018-IMK-MJA-1) Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Katy J. Cimino, Clarksburg, West Virginia, Kristen M. Leddy, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Sarah W. Montoro, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Lough pled guilty, pursuant to a conditional plea agreement, to possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) (2012). The district court sentenced Lough to 37 months' imprisonment. On appeal, Lough challenges the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress.

In United States v. McLamb, 880 F.3d 685 (4th Cir. 2018), we addressed a challenge to the same warrant at issue here and concluded that, even if the warrant violated the Fourth Amendment, the good faith exception precluded suppression of the evidence. Id. at 689-90. In light of McLamb, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Lough's motion to suppress.

Accordingly, we affirm the criminal judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Lough

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 4, 2018
No. 17-4125 (4th Cir. May. 4, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Lough

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL P. LOUGH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 4, 2018

Citations

No. 17-4125 (4th Cir. May. 4, 2018)