From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lopez-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 20, 2012
Crim. No. 2:11-cr-000815-CCC (D.N.J. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Crim. No. 2:11-cr-000815-CCC

03-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jose Lopez-Rodriguez

Paul W. Kevin Carlucci, Esq., AFPD Counsel for defendant


ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul W. Laymon, Trial Attorney, Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Department of Justice, and defendant Jose Lopez-Rodriguez, by Kevin Carlucci, Esq., AFPD, for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter for a period of 60 days to allow the parties to conduct plea negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea agreement, so that the parties may attempt to resolve the matter and thereby avoid a possible trial, and the defendant having consented to the continuance and waived his right to a speedy trial, and for good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The parties desire additional time to continue to negotiate a plea agreement, which if successful would render a trial in this matter unnecessary;

(2) Defendant Lopez-Rodriguez's co-defendant, who was in custody in the Southern District of California awaiting disposition of his identity hearing and transportation to the District of New Jersey, and who arrived in the District of New Jersey on February 6, 2012, and initially appeared on February 8, and pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(6), a reasonable period of delay is permitted when the defendant is joined for trial with a co-defendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted; see also, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(E) and (F), excluding delay attributable to removal or transportation of any defendant; and,

(3) Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

IT IS, therefore, on this 20th day of March, 2012,

ORDERED that this action be and hereby is continued for a period of 60 days from the date of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the period of 60 days from the date of this Order shall be excluded in c.omputing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

________________________

HON. Claire M. Cecchi

United States District Court Judge

Form and entry consented to:

________________________

Paul W. Laymon, Trial Attorney

________________________

Kevin Carlucci, Esq., AFPD

Counsel for defendant


Summaries of

United States v. Lopez-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 20, 2012
Crim. No. 2:11-cr-000815-CCC (D.N.J. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Lopez-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Jose Lopez-Rodriguez

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

Crim. No. 2:11-cr-000815-CCC (D.N.J. Mar. 20, 2012)