Opinion
No. 12-10591 D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01516-RCC
2013-10-22
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAMIRO LOPEZ-DIAZ, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding
Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ramiro Lopez-Diaz appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez-Diaz's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Lopez-Diaz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.