From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
Case No.: 2:11-CR-225 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-CR-225 WBS

10-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAMIRO LOPEZ and KARINA JUAREZ, Defendants.

CHRIS COSCA Attorney for Defendant RAMIRO LOPEZ DINA LEE SANTOS Attorney for Defendant KARINA JUAREZ MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant U. S. Attorney


LAW OFFICES OF CHRIS COSCA

Chris Cosca CA SBN 144546

Attorney for Defendant

RAMIRO LOPEZ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE


Stipulation

The parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate that the status conference scheduled for October 11, 2011 may be continued to October 24, 2011. Additional time is necessary for counsel to review and analyze discovery, conduct investigation, consider plea negotiations and fully assess potential options in this matter. The parties also agree that time may be excluded from the speedy trial calculation under the Speedy Trial Act for counsel preparation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h) (7) (B) (iv) and Local Code T4. It is further agreed and stipulated that the ends of justice served in granting this request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The undersigned have authorized Chris Cosca to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

CHRIS COSCA

Attorney for Defendant

RAMIRO LOPEZ

by: Dina L. Santos

DINA LEE SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

KARINA JUAREZ

MICHAEL D. ANDERSON

Assistant U. S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The status conference scheduled for October 11, 2011 is continued to October 24, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

Time is excluded from the speedy trial calculation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) (7) (B) (iv) and Local Code T4. The Court finds that a continuance is necessary to give the defendants reasonable time to prepare in this matter. The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
Case No.: 2:11-CR-225 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAMIRO LOPEZ and KARINA JUAREZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-CR-225 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)