Opinion
Case No.: 2:11-CR-225 WBS
09-08-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAMIRO LOPEZ and KARINA JUAREZ, Defendants.
by: CHRIS COSCA Attorney for Defendant RAMIRO LOPEZ by: DINA LEE SANTOS Attorney for Defendant KARINA JUAREZ by: MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant U. S. Attorney
LAW OFFICES OF CHRIS COSCA
Attorney for Defendant
RAMIRO LOPEZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS
CONFERENCE
Stipulation
The parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate that the status conference scheduled for September 12, 2011 may be continued to October 11, 2011. Additional time is necessary for counsel to review and analyze discovery, conduct investigation and complete plea negotiations. The parties also agree that time may be excluded from the speedy trial calculation under the Speedy Trial Act for counsel preparation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h) (7) (B) (iv) and Local Code T4. It is further agreed and stipulated that the ends of justice served in granting this request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
The undersigned counsel have authorized Chris Cosca to sign this stipulation on their behalf.
by: CHRIS COSCA
Attorney for Defendant
RAMIRO LOPEZ
by: DINA LEE SANTOS
Attorney for Defendant
KARINA JUAREZ
by: MICHAEL D. ANDERSON
Assistant U. S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The status conference scheduled for September 12, 2011 is continued to October 11, 2011 at 8:30 a.m.
Time is excluded from the speedy trial calculation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) (7) (B) (iv) and Local Code T4. The Court finds that a continuance is necessary to give the defendants reasonable time to prepare in this matter. The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE