From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lopez

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 9, 2022
3:22cr82 (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

3:22cr82

05-09-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. (2) KEVIN MATIAS LOPEZ

DENA J. KING, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DAVID W. KELLY Assistant United States Attorney


DENA J. KING, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

DAVID W. KELLY Assistant United States Attorney

CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE PENDING RULE 32.2(C)(2)

BASED UPON the Defendant's plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 924, 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), provided, however, that forfeiture of specific assets is subject to any and all third-party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), pending final adjudication herein:

One Maverick Arms, model 88, 12-gauge shotgun, serial number MV28435R seized from Defendant on or about November 1, 2020; and
Approximately $186 in U.S. currency seized from Defendant on or about November 1, 2020.

2. If and to the extent required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6), 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), and/or other applicable law, the United States shall publish notice and provide direct written notice of forfeiture.

3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3), upon entry of this order, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate, or dispose of the property, including depositions, interrogatories, and requests for production of documents, and to issue subpoenas pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45.

4. A forfeiture money judgment shall be included in the defendant's sentence, and the United States may take steps to collect the judgment from any property of the defendant, provided, the value of any forfeited specific assets shall be credited toward satisfaction of this money judgment upon liquidation.

The parties stipulate and agree that the aforementioned asset(s) constitute property derived from or traceable to proceeds of defendant's crime(s) herein and are therefore subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924, 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). The defendant hereby waives the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment against defendant. If the defendant has previously submitted a claim in response to an administrative forfeiture proceeding regarding any of this property, defendant hereby withdraws that claim. If defendant has not previously submitted such a claim, defendant hereby waives all right to do so.


Summaries of

United States v. Lopez

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 9, 2022
3:22cr82 (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. (2) KEVIN MATIAS LOPEZ

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

3:22cr82 (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2022)