From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Longoria

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division
Apr 8, 2024
CRIMINAL SA-22-CR-109-OLG (W.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2024)

Opinion

CRIMINAL SA-22-CR-109-OLG

04-08-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FLORENTINO LONGORIA II Defendant


ORDER

ORLANDO L. GARCIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On this date, the Court considered the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer, filed on April 2, 2024. Docket no. 40. Defendant filed a general objection “and reurging of his motion” on April 4, 2024. Docket no. 41. The recommendation has been reviewed for clear error. See Battle v. U.S. Parole Com 'n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987) (the Court need not conduct a de novo review if the objections are frivolous, general, or conclusory; instead, the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error). After such review, the Court finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation. Because Defendant has provided no reason for reconsideration, the “reurgpd” motion should also be denied.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation (docket no. 40) is ACCEPTED in its entirety. For the reasons stated in the recommendation, Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment (docket nos. 36, 41) is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Longoria

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division
Apr 8, 2024
CRIMINAL SA-22-CR-109-OLG (W.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Longoria

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FLORENTINO LONGORIA II Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division

Date published: Apr 8, 2024

Citations

CRIMINAL SA-22-CR-109-OLG (W.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2024)