From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Long

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Aug 10, 2023
2:23-mj-01088-ADB (D.N.J. Aug. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-mj-01088-ADB

08-10-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH LONG


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Matthew J. Skahill United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative COVIDH9 Standing Orders, tins Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason;

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability, [ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Long

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Aug 10, 2023
2:23-mj-01088-ADB (D.N.J. Aug. 10, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Long

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH LONG

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Aug 10, 2023

Citations

2:23-mj-01088-ADB (D.N.J. Aug. 10, 2023)