From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Locklear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina
Feb 13, 2012
Case No: 4:04-811-006 (TLW) (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 4:04-811-006 (TLW) USM No: 13460-171

02-13-2012

United States of America v. Carl Patrick Locklear

Pro se Defendant's Attorney


Date of Previous Judgment: November 23, 2010

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable

Pro se

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [×] the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [ ] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED (Doc. # 366). This case does not qualify for a reduction because the guideline range remains the same and is unaffected by Amendment 750.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date:

(if different from above)

Terry L. Wooten

Judge's signature

Terry L. Wooten, United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Locklear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina
Feb 13, 2012
Case No: 4:04-811-006 (TLW) (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Locklear

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Carl Patrick Locklear

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

Case No: 4:04-811-006 (TLW) (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2012)