From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Llaneza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 14, 2013
No. CR 13 00145 YGR (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 13 00145 YGR

05-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW LLANEZA, Defendant.

STEVEN G. KALAR Federal Public Defender JEROME E. MATTHEWS Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel for Defendant MATTHEW LLANEZA


STEVEN G. KALAR
Federal Public Defender
JEROME E. MATTHEWS
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Counsel for Defendant MATTHEW LLANEZA

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Matthew Llaneza presently is in custody on a charge of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, 18 U.S.C. § 2332(a)(2)(B). The parties' first status conference took place on 11 April 2013. At that conference, defense counsel informed the Court that a large amount of discovery had been produced and that the defense needed to review it and conduct an extensive investigation, including numerous interviews of out-of-state witnesses. To date, defense counsel has been unable to begin the interview process. The government has produced a significant amount of additional discovery and is in the process of obtaining the necessary clearances to produce discovery that defense counsel has requested but not yet received.

A status conference presently is scheduled for 16 May 2013. In light of the ongoing activities described in the previous paragraph, the parties believe that a status conference would be more productive in June than in May. Accordingly, the parties respectfully recommend and request that the Court continue the status conference to 27 June 2013. Defense counsel will be out of the office during the weeks of 3 June and 10 June 2013. In addition, in light of the defense's ongoing investigation and discovery review process, the parties agree that the time between 16 May 2013 and 27 June 2013 should excluded under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation as well as for continuity of defense counsel. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

SO STIPULATED.

______________________

JEROME E. MATTHEWS

Assistant Federal Public Defender

______________________

ANDREW CAPUTO

Assistant United States Attorney

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that this matter be continued to 27 June 2013 on the grounds set forth in the foregoing stipulation. The status conference date of 16 May 2013 is VACATED. For the reasons specified in the parties' stipulation, the time between 16 May 2013 and 27 June 2013 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation as well as continuity of defense counsel. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding this time outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Section 3161(h)(7)(A).

______________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Llaneza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 14, 2013
No. CR 13 00145 YGR (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Llaneza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW LLANEZA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

No. CR 13 00145 YGR (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)