Opinion
2:19-cr-00018-APG-FJY
11-02-2022
WRIGHT MARSH & LEVY RUSSELL E. MARSH, ESQUIRE WRIGHT MARSH & LEVY Attorney for Lorenzo Lucian Lindsey JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney JARED GRIMMER Assistant United States Attorney
WRIGHT MARSH & LEVY RUSSELL E. MARSH, ESQUIRE WRIGHT MARSH & LEVY Attorney for Lorenzo Lucian Lindsey
JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney JARED GRIMMER Assistant United States Attorney
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING (TENTH REQUEST)
ANDREW P. GORDON United States District Judge
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the JASON M. FRIERSON, United States of America, and JARED GRIMMER, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and RUSSELL E. MARSH, ESQUIRE, WRIGHT MARSH & LEVY, counsel for LORENZO LUCIAN LINDSEY; that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for November 9, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to a date and time convenient to the Court, but no sooner than 30 days from the current sentencing date.
This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. Defendant is currently in custody and does not object to the continuance.
2. The parties need additional time to determine their positions regarding sentencing, gather and prepare support for their positions, file sentencing memorandum and prepare for argument.
3. Counsel for Defendant recently received a Revised PSR prepared by U.S. Probation.Counsel requires additional time to consider and research issues raised by the Revised PSR, and to consult with the Defendant about them.
4. The parties agree to the requested continuance.
5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
6. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
This is the tenth request for a continuance of the sentencing hearing.
ORDER
Based on the Stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby continues the sentencing of Defendant Lorenzo Lucian Lindsey in this matter. The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy sentencing, because the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, and would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for sentencing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for November 9, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to December 14, 2022. at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6C.