From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Limas-Caldera

United States District Court DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Mar 2, 2012
Case Number: 11-20132-06-KHV-DJW (D. Kan. Mar. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 11-20132-06-KHV-DJW

03-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROSA ISELA LIMAS-CALDERA Defendant


ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), a detention hearing has been held. I conclude that the following facts require the detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.

Part I - Findings of Fact

[] (1) The defendant is charged with an offense described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1) and has been convicted of a (federal offense) (state or local offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed) that is

[] a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).
[] an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
[] an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in ____________
[] a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) (1)(A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.

[] (2) The offense described in finding (1) was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.

[] (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the (date of conviction) (release of the defendant from imprisonment) for the offense described in finding (1).

[] (4) Findings Nos. (1), (2) and (3) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of (an)other person(s) and the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

Alternative Findings (A)

[] (1) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense

[] for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in ____
[] under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

[] (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding 1 that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community.

Alternative Findings (B)

[] (1) There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear.

[] (2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person or the community. ____________

Part II - Written Statement of Reasons for Detention

I find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by (clear and convincing evidence) (a preponderance of the evidence) that Following completion of her detention hearing, defendant waived her right to a court determination of whether she should be detained and agreed to remain detained. The Court therefore orders defendant to remain detained pending further hearing.

Part III - Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

David J Waxse

Signature of Judicial Officer

DAVID J. WAXSE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Name and Title of Judicial Officer

*Insert as applicable: (a) Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.); (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. § 951 et seq.); or (c) Section 1 of Act of Sept. 15, 1980 (21 U.S.C. § 955a).


Summaries of

United States v. Limas-Caldera

United States District Court DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Mar 2, 2012
Case Number: 11-20132-06-KHV-DJW (D. Kan. Mar. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Limas-Caldera

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROSA ISELA LIMAS-CALDERA Defendant

Court:United States District Court DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Mar 2, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 11-20132-06-KHV-DJW (D. Kan. Mar. 2, 2012)