Opinion
22-6423
03-21-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO LAMONT LIGHTFOOT, Defendant-Appellant.
ON BRIEF: David Benowitz, PRICE BENOWITZ LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Erek L. Barron, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, Bijon A. Mostoufi, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 16, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:99-cr-00409-PJM-1)
ON BRIEF: David Benowitz, PRICE BENOWITZ LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Erek L. Barron, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, Bijon A. Mostoufi, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Antonio Lamont Lightfoot appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Lightfoot, No. 8:99-cr-00409-PJM-1 (D. Md. Mar. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED