From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Aug 11, 2017
No. 2:94 CR 50 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 11, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:94 CR 50

08-11-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PALIVIA GWENDELLA LEWIS


OPINION AND ORDER

In 1995, defendant Palivia Gwendella Lewis pleaded guilty to theft of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). Lewis was sentenced to three years of probation and was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $16,500.00. On March 12, 2014, Lewis moved to expunge the judicial record of her conviction. (DE # 24.) The court denied the motion. (DE # 25.) On August 10, 2017, Lewis filed a second motion seeking expungement. (DE # 26.) The court will deny that motion for the following reasons.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals previously held that "district courts . . . have jurisdiction to expunge records maintained by the judicial branch." United States v. Flowers, 389 F.3d 737, 739 (7th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Janik, 10 F.3d 470, 472 (7th Cir. 1993)). According to the Flowers and Janik decisions, "[t]he test for the expungement of judicial records is a balancing test: 'if the dangers of unwarranted adverse consequences to the individual outweigh the public interest in maintenance of the records, then expunction is appropriate.'" Id. (quoting Janik, 10 F.3d at 472).

However, the Seventh Circuit has since held that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), both "Flowers and Janik are overruled." United States v. Wahi, 850 F.3d 296, 303 (7th Cir. 2017). While certain statutes give the court expungement authority—see e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 3607(c) (permitting expungement motions in certain drug-possession cases)—a district court's "ancillary jurisdiction does not include a general equitable power to expunge judicial records in a criminal case." Wahi, 850 F.3d at 302-303.

In the case at hand, Lewis has not provided any statutory basis to give the court expungement authority. She merely argues that her conviction should be expunged for equitable reasons. Therefore, Lewis's motion to expunge (DE # 26) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: August 11, 2017

s/James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Aug 11, 2017
No. 2:94 CR 50 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 11, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PALIVIA GWENDELLA LEWIS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 11, 2017

Citations

No. 2:94 CR 50 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 11, 2017)