Opinion
Crim. A. No. 13776.
March 11, 1953.
Philip O. Carr, Asst. U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.
Albert Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.
The defendant in this case made the same motion as the defendant in the case of United States of America v. Singleton, D.C., 110 F. Supp. 634, counsel being the same for the two cases which arise out of similar circumstances.
For the reasons I have given in the opinion filed this day in the case of United States of America v. Singleton, defendant's motion for a new trial in the above-entitled case will be refused.