From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lewis

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2022
S2 21 Cr. 729 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)

Opinion

S2 21 Cr. 729 (LAK)

12-21-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHANETTE LEWIS, a/k/a “Netty Hott,” Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Michael D. Neff Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY CHANETTE LEWIS MARK COMBINER, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Federal Defenders of New York


DAMIAN WILLIAMS

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

Michael D. Neff

Assistant United States Attorney

U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY

CHANETTE LEWIS

MARK COMBINER, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

Federal Defenders of New York

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGEMENT

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about ______, 2022, CHANETTE LEWIS, a/k/a “Netty Hott” (the “Defendant”), was charged in a two-count superseding information, S2 21 Cr. 729 (LAK) (the “Information”), with two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Counts One and Two);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information;

WHEREAS, on or about ______, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One and Two of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Counts One and Two of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), a sum of money equal to $289,536 in United States currency, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $289,536 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Michael D. Neff, and the Defendant and her counsel, Mark Combiner, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $289,536 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant, 2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant CHANETTE LEWIS, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Lewis

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2022
S2 21 Cr. 729 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHANETTE LEWIS, a/k/a “Netty Hott,” Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

S2 21 Cr. 729 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)