From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lester

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 17, 2016
Case No. 2:04-CR-280 TS (D. Utah Oct. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-CR-280 TS

10-17-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIS MAX LESTER, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

On May 5, 2004, Defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, carrying and possessing a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a controlled substance. Defendant pleaded guilty to Counts I and II on April 6, 2005. On June 21, 2005, Defendant was sentenced to a term of 120 months in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, to be followed by 60 months of supervised release.

Defendant began his term of supervision on February 22, 2013. In his Motion, Defendant represents that he has complied with the terms of his supervised release. Defendant also represents that he has a number of physical ailments that make it difficult for him to work and that he would like to receive disability benefits. Consultation with Defendant's supervising officer confirms that Defendant has complied with the terms of supervision.

II. DISCUSSION

18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) permits the Court to terminate supervised release at any time after a defendant has completed at least one year of supervised release, but prior to completion of the entire term, if the Court is satisfied that such action is (1) warranted by the conduct of an offender and (2) is in the interest of justice. In making this determination, the Court is directed to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are applicable.

Having considered these factors, reviewed the docket and case file, and consulted with Defendant's supervising officer, the Court finds that early termination of Defendant's term of supervised release is both warranted by the conduct of the offender and in the interest of justice.

III. CONCLUSION

It is therefore

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Docket No. 46) is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that Defendant's term of supervised release shall be terminated effective immediately and this case shall be closed.

DATED this 17th day of October, 2016.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Ted Stewart

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Lester

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 17, 2016
Case No. 2:04-CR-280 TS (D. Utah Oct. 17, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Lester

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIS MAX LESTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Oct 17, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:04-CR-280 TS (D. Utah Oct. 17, 2016)