From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 25, 2015
2:05-cr-00336-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. Jun. 25, 2015)

Opinion

2:05-cr-00336-RCJ-GWF

06-25-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DENISE LOKELANI LEE, Defendant.


ORDER

Defendant asks the Court to amend the Mar. 4, 2009 Presentence Investigation Report to add substance abuse information. She disclaims any challenge to her judgment of conviction or sentence. Rule 35 therefore does not apply. Rule 36 does not apply, either, because Defendant claims no clerical error but only her own previous failure to disclose the information to the U.S. Probation Office. The Court therefore has no basis under the rules to grant the motion. See United States v. Hall, No. 1:04-CR-00024(9), 2008 WL 924529, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2008).

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend the Presentence Investigation Report (ECF No. 204) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 25th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 25, 2015
2:05-cr-00336-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. Jun. 25, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DENISE LOKELANI LEE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 25, 2015

Citations

2:05-cr-00336-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. Jun. 25, 2015)