Opinion
21-6875
12-27-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAY B. LEDFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
Jay B. Ledford, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: December 21, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00465-RDB-2)
Jay B. Ledford, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Jay B. Ledford appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ledford's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (2021) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED