Opinion
2:11-cr-313 GEB
08-31-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA aka Sergio Ledesma, Defendant.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar #214897
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA
STIPULATION AND
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME
JUDGE: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for September 2, 2011 be continued to October 7, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.
Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for October 7, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL J. BRODERICK
Federal Defender
BENJAMIN GALLOWAY
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
SERGIO LEDESMA-ARAIZA
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
Benjamin Galloway for
JASON HITT
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER
IT HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to October 7, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. for Further Status Conference.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from the date of this order up to and including October 7, 2011, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR
United States District Judge